Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Moderator: CharmQuark
Forum rules
Any controversial topic can be discussed. Freedom of expression is encouraged. The scientific validity of things posted in this forum may stray from reality quite wildly and the reader is advised to keep that in mind. Please refrain from bad language and DO NOT get overly abusive with other members. You MUST post in English. It is OK to have fiercely intense debate. This forum has no connection with CERN, the LHC or my site. The views here do not represent the forum's views or my views in any way. It is meant as a place to debate or discuss subjects that may create heated debate. Almost no moderation will occur in this forum at all.
Any controversial topic can be discussed. Freedom of expression is encouraged. The scientific validity of things posted in this forum may stray from reality quite wildly and the reader is advised to keep that in mind. Please refrain from bad language and DO NOT get overly abusive with other members. You MUST post in English. It is OK to have fiercely intense debate. This forum has no connection with CERN, the LHC or my site. The views here do not represent the forum's views or my views in any way. It is meant as a place to debate or discuss subjects that may create heated debate. Almost no moderation will occur in this forum at all.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
So first protons decay into neutrons, and then back into protons again? Sounds a bit as if it violates energy conservation.
How big is your expected flux of neutrinos that causes radiation sickness?
How big is your expected flux of neutrinos that causes radiation sickness?
- tswsl1989
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:22 pm
- Location: Swansea, Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Ivan, do you know how many neutrinos penetrate the average human each second?MagneticTrap wrote:At the final part of the dangerous object’s growth a huge amount of neutrino will penetrate everybody of us. The flux will be so big, that it will lead to some nuclear reactions in our cells. If the total time of dangerous object is big (about 1000 seconds) then we all can be able to feel what radiation sickness is.
Do you know how many of those interact?
I know the answers to both of those questions, but your statement above leads me to believe that you don't know, or don't understand.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:21 pm
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Bolded mine.MagneticTrap wrote: <Spam removed>
Aah ha!!...So this is where you ended up hiding out Ivan.What a surprise it is that you still go on with these highly theories of yours after many weeks have passed since the last hopeless prediction you made.
Your credibility and any merit in your arguments is that of a lump of coal mate.
Get some sun shine and someone to some sense back into you.
Cheers mate.
Agent out...
- MagneticTrap
- Posts: 162
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 2:56 pm
- Location: Ukraine Crimea Feodosia
- Contact:
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
No, if the dangerous object is magnetic hole, then magnetic hole ruins protons, dividing them into x-bosons and positrons. Bosons are captured by the hole; positrons annihilate with surrounding electrons. The number of bosons in the magnetic hole is denoted by index under the notation of magnetic hole, NS:Mailo wrote:So first protons decay into neutrons, and then back into protons again? Sounds a bit as if it violates energy conservation.
NS_{n} + p = NS_{n+1} + e^+ + 300 MeV.
NS_{n+1} + p = NS_{n+2} + e^+ + 300 MeV.
NS_{n+2} + p = NS_{n+3} + e^+ + 300 MeV.
...
...
The matter becomes rich by neutrons and neutron-excessive nuclei. Neutrons have negative magnetic moments and, as a result, they are appealed by the magnetic hole. Free neutrons decays per protons, electrons and antineutrinos; neutron-excessive nuclei in their majority undergo a beta^- decay and, as a result, they are also a source of electron antineutrino.
1/ Sorry, typo: Change the sentence: “If the total time of dangerous object is big (about 1000 seconds) then we all can be able to feel what radiation sickness is.” by the sentence: “If the total time of dangerous object is big (about 1000 days) then we all can be able to feel what radiation sickness is.”tswsl1989 wrote:Ivan, do you know how many neutrinos penetrate the average human each second?MagneticTrap wrote:At the final part of the dangerous object’s growth a huge amount of neutrino will penetrate everybody of us. The flux will be so big, that it will lead to some nuclear reactions in our cells. If the total time of dangerous object is big (about 1000 seconds) then we all can be able to feel what radiation sickness is.
Do you know how many of those interact?
I know the answers to both of those questions, but your statement above leads me to believe that you don't know, or don't understand.
2/ Dear tswsl1989, at the final part of dangerous object growth, the flux of neutrino will be so big, that all matter around us will be radioactive. In the final days the Earth will shake in the last huge global earthquake; we all will shake in fever of radiation sickness.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:21 pm
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Ivan. Cut the spam.MagneticTrap wrote: 2/ Dear tswsl1989, at the final part of dangerous object growth, the flux of neutrino will be so big, that all matter around us will be radioactive. In the final days the Earth will shake in the last huge global earthquake; we all will shake in fever of radiation sickness.
You did not answer tswsl's question.
tswsl1989 wrote: Ivan, do you know how many neutrinos penetrate the average human each second?
Do you know how many of those interact?
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
From all this I am getting an impression that all these people seeking zero-point energy and constructing magnetic motors are going to destroy Earth soon...
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
And once again MagneticTrap ignores a request to substantiate his wild claims by offering his calculations or at least numbers. Why am I not surprised?
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Can a state of zero point energy trigger a vacuum metastability event? From what I read on Wikipedia, both of these terms seem related in a way.Kasuha wrote:From all this I am getting an impression that all these people seeking zero-point energy and constructing magnetic motors are going to destroy Earth soon...
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
They are both related in that they are trying to pull energy out of nothing.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Thats how I feel on monday mornings when the alarm goes......Kasuha wrote: trying to pull energy out of nothing.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:50 am
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
That's a good one!mrgumby wrote:Thats how I feel on monday mornings when the alarm goes......Kasuha wrote: trying to pull energy out of nothing.
- CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Ivan
Tell me how your job is going Miss not having you around so much Hope you are keeping ok?
Be safe
Emmylou
Tell me how your job is going Miss not having you around so much Hope you are keeping ok?
Be safe
Emmylou
Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.
-
- LHCPortal Guru
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 1:03 am
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
As technically Ivan has talked about Wagner and such and holding him in good regard, I've decided to post here the date for his 2008 Court case conclusion:
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/c ... i06_10.pdf
Wagner has 10 mins to argue against the LHC, dunno who is in attendance yet, could be interesting if irrelevant.
Kudo's for Rpenner on another forum for keeping an eye out.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/c ... i06_10.pdf
Wagner has 10 mins to argue against the LHC, dunno who is in attendance yet, could be interesting if irrelevant.
Kudo's for Rpenner on another forum for keeping an eye out.
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
How come Ivan doesn't post here anymore?
- CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Stephen wrote:How come Ivan doesn't post here anymore?
Stephen i was wondering that myself i have no idea where he is...maybe just busy? hopefully he is happy
Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.