Page 1 of 1

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 5:45 pm
by CharmQuark
yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss :dance: Love it so much :D can't beat a bit of Brian :oops: :oops: thanks Orion :thumbup:

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 7:56 pm
by Stephen
It'd be so funny if the LHC finds nothing.

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 8:03 pm
by CharmQuark
Stephen wrote:It'd be so funny if the LHC finds nothing. :sleeping-asleep: :sleeping-blue:
It could happen yanno :shifty: :D then they have to rethink everything :ugeek: Good Times :thumbup:

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:00 pm
by Allan
Hi emmylou

According to the latest release of data from the December run the number of mesons detected are greater then the number predicted by the model. So it would appear there is something at least a little bit unexpected going on there.

Allan

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:05 pm
by Stephen
Unexpected as in a small difference, or unexpected as in "string theory may be right" kind of way?

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:20 am
by CharmQuark
Allan wrote:Hi emmylou

According to the latest release of data from the December run the number of mesons detected are greater then the number predicted by the model. So it would appear there is something at least a little bit unexpected going on there.

Allan
Sounds interesting :D

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:41 am
by chriwi
unexpected in the way that they get something not predicted by any theory by now, so they have to make a correction in their experiment/measurement or in their theorys afterall.
Tere was no consideration if SST or any other accepted theory would give a possibility to explain theese mesurements.

Interesting is mainly: if the standard-model cannot predict htees meson-rates but predicts a highs-particle, maybe standard model is wrong in the way that there is noc Highs after all.

Would be interesting to know if Ivans theory has an expaination for theese unexpectet meson-rates. But since he prefers not to work with math and numbers I don't belive that he could predict any rates of particles at all.

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:48 pm
by LarryS
For any anomaly discovered by the LHC, Ivan will stand up and shout that his theory predicted this result.

Just watch ...

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:53 pm
by CharmQuark
LarryS wrote:For any anomaly discovered by the LHC, Ivan will stand up and shout that his theory predicted this result.

Just watch ...
Spot on Larry :thumbup: :cry:

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:31 pm
by chriwi
Spot on Ivan, he already did before the post of Larry, but up to now he cannot explain his claim.

:lol:

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:02 pm
by LarryS
Had not seen his post but ... does this mean that I am beginning to think like him?

If so, let me throw myself into the nearest magnetic hole!

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:04 pm
by CharmQuark
LarryS wrote:Had not seen his post but ... does this mean that I am beginning to think like him?

If so, let me throw myself into the nearest magnetic hole!
hahaha Larry don't do that you can come on mine and Orions comet if ya want :thumbup:

Re: In Search of Giants

Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:57 am
by CharmQuark
:Big Love: smiles I think i have watched nearly everything that brian has been in haha :Big Oops: