1). Why did not you show her my math proves? http://darkenergy.narod.ru/magtren.htmlXymox wrote:I am visiting my family right now. I did a test. I had my mom read the thread. After a bit she gave up and was sure that the LHC was not going to cause a magnetic trap of the devil. She asked some key questions. 1) Why has he never provided proof ? 2) why does he not want to publish his new science ? Her conclusions were that he was obviously incorrect.
2). It is impossible to do that. I am banned on the most of physics forums. Most of scientific magazines are in hands of CERN oriented peoples. For example, AFAIK, the article of Rössler was not published at once from the first attempt. He was forced to publish his article in his own magazine.
Good economist or politician can make quite good predictions about future developments in the correspondent area. I give my predictions as a physicist, who had a quite solid experience in this branch of human activity. I'm no worse than physicists from CERN, and I had shown you their crude errors.Stephen wrote:Ivan, maybe I wasn't asking clearly enough.
How did you calculate the probability of a magnetic collapse?
OK, ORION111, let CERN kill us silently. Let CERN kill our children and mothers without any resistance from us.ORION111 wrote:Chris, I agree with you. But by "something needs to be done", I mean we need to have something like a note clearly stating that the fear in this thread is highly unsubstantiated. It scares people who don't have the sufficient understanding of LHC nor the sufficient knowledge of physics. I have read people's statements who were really led astray and scared by Ivan.
And what was the energy of positron; of proton? What kinetic energy would have a resulting particle? Is it more than 170 GeV, which is computed binding energy of minimal magnetic hole.Anitusar wrote:You do know, that at DESY they collided positron and protons with 320GeV for quite some time. Nothing happened, how come?People, please, stop powerful colliders immediately.
Collisions with energy, more that 100 GeV must be banned by international law.
From the correspondence on the forum http://www.physforum.com/index.php?show ... ntry442629
Yes, this problem is simple. It was and can be solved in mind.Intuitively?I solved that problem intuitively.
CERN’s physicists are usual people and they also can make errors. This crude error was made by them in 2003. Dozens of groups of physicists read the article and said that it was excellent job. But not long ago, September of 2009-year, I found this crude error by accident. No one, AFAIK, pointed on it earlier.
And here the following questions arise.
1. Is it acceptable that in the documents on the safety of LHC there are errors? Can we believe to other assertions of CERN now?
2. If that was me, who had found this error in the CERN safety documents, then why do you neglect another my conclusion about the possibility of magnetic hole creation at LHC and about the explosion of Earth?
3. CERN physicists say that the probability of global catastrophe, which can launched by LHC, is zero. I say that this probability is about of dozens percents. Who are correct now? And who makes the error? Are you ready to die in the sake of your king-idols from CERN? Are you ready to sacrifice lives of your children and mothers for the sake of Higgs Boson; are you ready to destroy the Earth in order to prove Hawking’s BH evaporation?