Read, for example, a new article of Prof. Eric Johnson
“The Black Hole Case: The Injunction Against the End of the World” http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5480
I've read this and re-read it and I know Prof Johnsons logic is flawed.
However he does also have a point that the LSAG report was not impartial, from the point a law case is concerned.
(if u need an example of how flawed it is, he says "well u know LSAG isnt to be 100% trusted because some of them are under CERN", however he fails to point out every organisation known to man regarding physics endorsed it, and it was exstensivly peer reviewed, and deemed solid).
As for Wagner? LOL He has moaned about accelerators for 10 years and never ever ever grasped the understanding nor is able to comment about typical theories, nor has he ever written a paper, he justs cut and pastes key wordings from documents and papers, to encourage fear, his real motives are unclear, however he is clearly upto something.
(he also has no qualifications regarding physics, and is well known for saying he's something he's not, (his own site says's he's Dr. Wagner which is mis-leading as he isnt a Dr. as such (if atall as even his legal Doctrate is called into question) also he has a now well funded court case against him for fraud (thanks to daily show).
The other guy Sancho, OMG least you are attempting to attack the LHC on scientific grounds Ivan this guy is off the charts for nuttsville.
Otto Rössler, Rainer Plaga both had their papers slammed, even tho CERN distanced itself from digging into them, (wise really shows they don't want to laugh in superiority) however what Rössler and Plaga did do is bring people together for conversation, which isnt generally a bad thing.
"and so on" who else? im seeing 5 people (6 including Ivan) that are rumbling on about doomsday from the LHC 6 out of 5 billion, NON are connected to physics in any way, its like me telling a pilot how to fly.
IF the LHC could really blow up the earth for the small sum of $10 billion then why the hell isnt North Korea building one, or any other countries that feel the need to bandish arms, or any war mongering folk?
Cheaper than weapons development by about 4000%, hold the world to ransom, buildable underground to secure against destruction, sounds like the perfect weapon to me.
We can talk about this for ever, but 1 million collision events already Ivan, thats already blown your own "destruction estimates" away, even tho only you hold the key to how the percentages work.....