What is your justification for describing pB = mc^2 as a Magnetic Hole?
Let’s study analogies between holes and wells of different nature (gravitational, nuclear, electric, magnetic, electromagnetic, chromomagnetic, mixed) in different spaces (configurational, isotopic, energetic).
Gravitational (Newtonian) black hole: GMm/r = mc^2/2.
Nuclear quasi-hole: E_{b} = Δ(mc^2).
Electric monopole hole: kq^2/r = mc^2.
Magnetic monopole hole: kq_{m}^2 / r = mc^2.
Electric dipole hole: p_{el}E = mc^2.
Magnetic dipole hole: p_{m}B = mc^2.
Electromagnetic hole: p_{el}E + p_{m}B = mc^2.
…
Right sides of equations are the rest energies of the objects, or defect, as in the case of nuclear quasi-hole, or…
Left side is the energy of the field, which is completely or almost completely outside of the radius.
In the case of gravity hole – there is nothing inside the Schwarzschild radius. All energy is the energy of a gravity funnel. But there are no completely formed holes. Black holes are impossible, but gravitational collapse is possible and collapse is accompanied by gamma-burst and disappearance of gravity funnel.
Extremely urgent note:
Observable facts: there are gamma-bursts with the energy comparable to the total rest energy of stars.
Not proved official hypotheses, transformed into dogmas: existence of black holes; evaporation of black holes.
Dangerous conclusions: astronomers see black holes; there is a huge black hole in the center of our Galaxy, others false dogmatic conclusions.
More philosophically reliable conclusions: corrected Hawking formula describes luminosities of stars; in the Universe there are no any black holes.
Nuclear quasi-hole: E_{b} = Δ(mc^2).
Nucleus can be thought as quasi-hole or well, bonded by nuclear forces. Nuclear quasi-holes are limited by last, almost stable element U, because protons repeal each other by electric forces.
Nuclear quasi-hole explains us:
1. why the mass of nucleon differs, dependently of quantity of nucleons in nucleus;
2. the cause of the depth of well;
3. the cause of width of well;
4. dependence of capture ability from the kinetic energy of captured particle.
These properties are common to some other holes and wells!
Electric monopole hole: kq^2/r = mc^2.
This formula gives us the possibility to compute the classical radius of an electron. There is nothing inside the classical radius. The whole electron is outside the radius in the form of electric field! Electric monopole hole does not grow.
Magnetic monopole hole: kq_{m}^2 / r = mc^2.
Classical electrodynamics forbids the magnetic monopole hole.
Physical vacuum is the not the absolutely empty medium. It is filled by different virtual pairs. In extremely strong fields (caused by collisions of particles of the same charge) the vacuum can be exited. Exited places of vacuum, which are able to destroy protons and to grow, capturing the remnants of protons, were named by Magnetic Holes. It was investigated further that electromagnetic holes are much more real. They can explain us a large variety of observable data.
But CERN is not interested in the physics now. It is the criminal organization, which will non stop themselves. It can be stop only by police. That is almost impossible, - so, people, be ready to die very soon.
You start talking about CERN's calculations of magnetic monopoles again. Didn't you say you were afraid of magnetic holes and not magnetic monopoles?
CERN did investigate monopoles and did not investigate magnetic holes (which are dipoles), but their main property, - the intensity of interaction with protons, - is similar.
The danger of magnetic monopoles was studied in length, and they concluded that there isn't any danger.
And they made several crude errors in their calculations. I suspect that the 2003 and 2008 articles are falsified dummies, designed to fool and pacify the population. That is a crime! They will kill us all.
You still haven't explained the existence of neutron stars and white dwarfs, which are much denser than the earth, and wouldn't be here if dangerous monopoles could be created in particle collisions.
The existence of neutron stars and white dwarfs can be applicable as an argument against microscopic black holes with extremely small cross sections (r=10^-51 m). But magnetic holes have much bigger cross sections (r=10^-16 m). CERN used the small number of destructed protons as an argument against magnetic monopoles, but as we can see, they made an error there.
Don't you think all the educated scientists who have read the report would have noticed if there was something wrong or missing from the calculation?
Those
educated people have several reasons to risk and lie: 1. They (several men from administration) want to receive the new collaptical (annihilation) source of energy and to become the richest people in the world. But they do not know that those sources will work only about 1000 seconds. 2. Some of them (several main theorists) dream to receive the Noble prizes; 3. Most of them (narrow specialists) do not want to lost the highly paid jobs; do not know about dangers; work only at their work places; do not think about the danger at home, at night dreams. 4. Even if they learn about their errors, they will not say the truth, because then they must respond about the huge money, spent on the LHC construction.
Happy new year to you too. Let's hope this is the year when you finally stop being afraid of your invented theories.
Be happy, happy, dear Stephen. But I hope a little that we can be saved only by some miracle, or by some ObL.