Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:47 pm
Oh he posted
when are we due to die now?
when are we due to die now?
THE place to discuss the LHC
http://lhcportal.com/Forum/
Allan wrote:Hi CQ
What else do you expect 1000 days as always.
You have to give him credit if he sticks with that long enough he is going to be correct eventually.
Ivan is correct just like a stopped watch. Twice a day it is precisely correct.
I have given up on him ages ago.
Allan
Yes, dear Stephen, WIMPs are not dangerous, because they are very hypothetic and have no any observational prove.Stephen wrote:The LHC is not going to create WIMPs, Ivan.
I wonder why this didn't apply to stable strangelets, microscopic black holes or magnetic holes you seemed to like so much.MagneticTrap wrote:Yes, dear Stephen, WIMPs are not dangerous, because they are very hypothetic and have no any observational prove.
This is even more hypothetic than WIMPsMagneticTrap wrote:What is dark matter?
I think that one of a large variety of different types of fermionic and bosonic subnuclear condensates can be a much trustworthy candidate on the role of dark matter.
Now you are dreaming again.MagneticTrap wrote:Can the ordinary matter be transformed into a dark matter?
Yes, and we can see such transformations as novae and supernovae explosions.
...
Allan thank you for bursting my nice little bubble I won't sleep tonight nowAllan wrote:Well CQ I am here to tell you that I think just about everyone is ahead of Ivan.
Allan
Thanks. That is more what I was thingingLarryS wrote:Given Ivan's perfect track record (100% wrong) ... the more predictions he makes, the safer we are.
Allan wrote:Sorry CQ.
I guess I didn't say that correctly because what I meant was that you should not worry about him at all. Most everything he says is simply drivel.
Allan
Larry couldn't have said it better myselfLarryS wrote:Given Ivan's perfect track record (100% wrong) ... the more predictions he makes, the safer we are.