Yes, my thoughts are analogues to his thoughts.
But who is he; why does he hidden behind the nick?
CharmQuark wrote:Ivan I miss you
thought we was gonna go away to an island somewhere for 3 months
bet you have forgot about it
Dear CharmQuark! The probability of our common tour to uninhabited planet in icy comet is much more probable than to an island.
To all:
I regularly look at the page
http://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webto ... p?usr=LHC3
It would be great to have another online page, - about the intensity of electron antineutrino, registered at neutrino observatories.
I think that contemporary earthquakes and volcanoes have no any connection to the collapse of matter at dangerous objects, created by LHC. Nevertheless, dangerous objects can initiate global earthquakes and volcanoes, but that will happen only after 90-95% of time, needed by object in order to explode the Earth.
But the existence of dangerous objects can be registered much earlier by the growing flux of electron antineutrino from the center of the Earth. I think it can be registered at 50-60% of time, needed by object in order to explode the Earth.
For example, if the total time from birth to explosion is 1000 days, then at 500-th - 600-th day the excess of antineutrino can be already registered. At 900 – 950-th day the activity of earthquakes and volcanoes will began to grow drastically.
If the total time of dangerous object’s growth is 100 (or 10) days, - divide the upper values by 10 (100) times.
Uncertainty of object’s growth time from 10^-23 kg to 10^23 kg is connected by many causes.