Anything can be discussed, tempers may flare.
This forum has no connection with CERN, the LHC or my site.
Moderator: CharmQuark
Forum rules
Any controversial topic can be discussed. Freedom of expression is encouraged. The scientific validity of things posted in this forum may stray from reality quite wildly and the reader is advised to keep that in mind. Please refrain from bad language and DO NOT get overly abusive with other members. You MUST post in English. It is OK to have fiercely intense debate. This forum has no connection with CERN, the LHC or my site. The views here do not represent the forum's views or my views in any way. It is meant as a place to debate or discuss subjects that may create heated debate. Almost no moderation will occur in this forum at all.
-
Stephen
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:09 pm
Post
by Stephen » Thu Oct 07, 2010 4:55 pm
Luis Sancho's website is hardly a reliable source, oyar.
Besides, "big Earth changes"? This phrase reminds me of the phrases 2012 doomsday opponents use.
-
CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Post
by CharmQuark » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:20 pm
For the love of God
LOL CERN truth omg...............Give me a break
I am gonna stay outta this convo and let you guys deal with this one

Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.
-
rasalhauge
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:42 pm
Post
by rasalhauge » Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:41 pm
Please point out the anomaly of this years earthquake activity. The record amount of mag. 8 earthuakes wasn't this year, neither was the record for mag 6, 7 nor mag 5. One of the most seismically active years was 1994, but the LHC must have caused that too?
The biggest recorded quake in modern time took place in Chile back in the sixties, did LHC cause that too?
-
oyar
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:28 am
Post
by oyar » Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:01 pm
People, I just say that another point of view on the hole growth can be considered.

By the way, who knows the dates of sub-TeV experiments at Berkley? Possibly we can find the correlation with 1994...

-
CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Post
by CharmQuark » Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:08 pm
Oyar

tell us some more about you.......are you married? do you have kids? what in your life makes you happy?
Your views are welcome
Do you have any concerns like real concerns about LHC?
I have heard so many stories about what they might be causing in the earth. I find it funny, why do i find it funny? because people that say it don't really have a clue what is going on in the first place

Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.
-
rasalhauge
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:42 pm
Post
by rasalhauge » Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:46 pm
If it looks like an Ivan and talks like an Ivan....
-
CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Post
by CharmQuark » Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:56 pm
rasalhauge wrote:If it looks like an Ivan and talks like an Ivan....
Then it must be Ivan

Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.
-
CharmQuark
- Site Admin
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:22 am
- Location: Berwick-Upon-Tweed (UK)
Post
by CharmQuark » Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:09 am
Nice link for you oyar
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/wilder ... amous-pits
In the strictly geological sense, sinkholes occur when water erodes solid bedrock, creating an underground cavity that collapses inward. However, the term can be used in a broader sense to describe any sudden slump of the Earth's surface. Regardless of how you define them, these massive holes capture our curiosity with the mysteries of their bottomless depth.........
Crashed and Burned

Anyone who doesn't take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted with large ones either by Albert Einstein.