Sound = transmission of pressure through the structure of the material
Heat = motion of atoms due to energy
Search found 165 matches
- Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:44 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: Why is our universe so complicated?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 32170
- Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:41 pm
- Forum: New Users Start Here
- Topic: Brand new Mac Pro here
- Replies: 6
- Views: 11681
Re: Brand new Mac Pro here
No, that server appears to be dead
- Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:15 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: Why is our universe so complicated?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 32170
Re: Why is our universe so complicated?
The reason is that we've expressed our understanding of the universe through the wrong basis, and when we get the basis correct it will not appear so complicated. And yet so many things work and we can predict so much. What is the "correct" basis for understanding the universe? Any who accept that ...
- Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:08 am
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Magnetic Holes and Golden Section
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11442
Re: Magnetic Holes and Golden Section
And nobody is surprised when Ivan posts something with no physical grounding whatsoever.........
Any fool can write random equations and draw pictures.
Any fool can write random equations and draw pictures.
- Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:03 am
- Forum: Off topic
- Topic: Portal 1 year anniversary
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17941
Re: Portal 1 year anniversary
I have a lab report due in on the 12th, so will almost certainly be having a drink or two.
Or I'll be comatose and asleep because I haven't slept
Or I'll be comatose and asleep because I haven't slept
- Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:59 am
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Eric Penrose
- Replies: 24
- Views: 51351
Re: Eric Penrose
MagneticTrap,
I think you've been warned previously about fearmongering in other peoples threads. If you don't have anything constructive to add to a thread then don't post.
Stephen,
I've read through those tables, and I don't see any cause for concern.
I think you've been warned previously about fearmongering in other peoples threads. If you don't have anything constructive to add to a thread then don't post.
Stephen,
I've read through those tables, and I don't see any cause for concern.
- Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:05 pm
- Forum: Off topic
- Topic: Tell me something exciting!!!
- Replies: 17
- Views: 22658
Re: Tell me something exciting!!!
You get quite a sun tan though. Briefly
- Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:16 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Current Events Discussion
- Replies: 512
- Views: 607915
Re: Current Events Discussion
Hehe, Alchemy @ CERN
- Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:15 pm
- Forum: Off topic
- Topic: Portal 1 year anniversary
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17941
Re: Portal 1 year anniversary
Thats come around quick. Christmas Eve marks 1 year of me using this site
- Fri Sep 17, 2010 4:43 pm
- Forum: New Users Start Here
- Topic: hi
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6659
Re: hi
Welcome to the forum. Always good to see interested people joining up
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 4:43 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
- Replies: 1135
- Views: 1370450
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
So that model completely ignores everything we already know about physics, up to and including the fact that there are three generations of quarks. Ivan: Initially your claims were interesting, but seemed outrageously unlikely and you refused to provide any meaningful proof. Now you're grasping at a...
- Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:12 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Current Events Discussion
- Replies: 512
- Views: 607915
Re: Current Events Discussion
I don't think theres any preparations for heavy ion physics until after November's technical stop.
See the schedule
See the schedule
- Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:14 pm
- Forum: Off topic
- Topic: My personal journey
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7694
Re: My personal journey
Good on you CQ
It can take quite a bit to face up to your fears, and you seem to have turned yourself completely about and embraced this as an interest.
I'm glad it's all more than
It can take quite a bit to face up to your fears, and you seem to have turned yourself completely about and embraced this as an interest.
I'm glad it's all more than
- Tue Sep 07, 2010 12:30 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
- Replies: 1135
- Views: 1370450
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Or indeed link any of his "science" to the rest of the real worldSince the standard model of particle physics is more than a little obsolete according to none other than Gorelik himself, it would be fun to see how he manages to link neutrino flux to his ground breaking mBH's theory...
- Fri Sep 03, 2010 3:49 pm
- Forum: Controversial topics
- Topic: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
- Replies: 1135
- Views: 1370450
Re: Several biggest errors of particle physicists.
Some colorful circles or graphs with no explanations, units or whatsoever mean absolutely nothing. Ok, your model is better than the old one? Justify! Give us observations and experiments that have proven with good statistical significance that the old model is wrong. I can write some funny formula...