Quite actual online lumi
https://lpc.web.cern.ch/lumiplots_2016_pp.htm
CMS, also plots with corrected (offline) lumi, but slower update.
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CM ... licResults
BTW: 5030 is going to be a new record fill, past 525/pb for Atlas and almost 500/pb for CMS.
Search found 27 matches
- Tue Jun 21, 2016 4:54 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: What are the current records for LHC fills?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91393
- Sat Jun 18, 2016 7:48 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: What are the current records for LHC fills?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91393
Re: What are the current records for LHC fills?
https://indico.cern.ch/event/442390/contributions/1096117/attachments/1289665/1920065/LHCP16_EM.pdf Mid july was just mentioned this week on the LHCP with a target of >5/fb, mission accomplished today and still 3-4 weeks to go. So I think it is not unrealistic to see recorded 15/fb used (combined wi...
- Wed Jun 15, 2016 8:44 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: What are the current records for LHC fills?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91393
Re: What are the current records for LHC fills?
Reading the article, I just wonder which data will be used for the summer conferences, when will be the deadline? With 3 >400/pb runs in a row, I guess at the end of the week they will far above 5/fb. They will run than 5 other weeks without longer stops. At the actual great pace (I guess some peopl...
- Sat Jun 04, 2016 9:10 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: How stringent is the ~100fb for 2016-2018?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 12041
Re: How stringent is the ~100fb for 2016-2018?
Thanks for the details, this confirms why no further intensity increase was done.
We have another >300pb run with initial lumi above 8e33, so just 6 runs like this per week for 2fb/week.
We have another >300pb run with initial lumi above 8e33, so just 6 runs like this per week for 2fb/week.
- Sat May 21, 2016 8:24 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: What are the current records for LHC fills?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91393
Re: What are the current records for LHC fills?
Fresh from the morning meeting:
Longest fill in Stable Beams in the LHC history was Fill 1058 that lasted from 1:13am April 24th 2010 until 7:30am 25th April 2010 for a total of 30h17min
- Sat May 21, 2016 4:52 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: What are the current records for LHC fills?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91393
Re: What are the current records for LHC fills?
The longest fill I found was fill 2006, just slightly below 26h. Just passed, so at least we have a new record for longest fill.
- Fri May 20, 2016 8:17 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: What are the current records for LHC fills?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91393
Re: What are the current records for LHC fills?
Here we go PS is down for 5 days. Lets hope they can hold the beam for some time.mfb wrote:Preaccelerator issues are good for lumi/fill records.
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:54 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Protons and Special Relativity
- Replies: 8
- Views: 17215
Re: Protons and Special Relativity
According to this site, this effect could even not explained by the standard model, e.g. the QCD.
http://nohiggs.wordpress.com/2010/06/28 ... he-proton/
http://nohiggs.wordpress.com/2010/06/28 ... he-proton/
- Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:32 am
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: Protons and Special Relativity
- Replies: 8
- Views: 17215
Re: Protons and Special Relativity
Hi all, I just wondering. An increase of the crossection (also the for elastic scattering) is something absolutely unexpected for me. If I take electrons and increase the energy the cross section gets smaller. Otherwise no one would do transmission elctron microscopy at higher energies like 300kV in...
- Tue May 17, 2011 8:48 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2011 Events Discussion
- Replies: 184
- Views: 259926
Re: 2011 Events Discussion
Seems to work, just in this moment 108 bunches in one injection were done.PhilG wrote: but that will require a new injection setup for 108 bunches at a time.
- Sat Mar 19, 2011 9:59 pm
- Forum: The Accelerator
- Topic: 2011 Events Discussion
- Replies: 184
- Views: 259926
Re: 2011 Events Discussion
Last 2 turnarounds from dump to physics were less than 3 hours. Theoritical limit is around 2 hours. Good Job!!PhilG wrote: They managed a turnround of only 2.5 hours between runs, much better than last year.
- Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:18 pm
- Forum: Science
- Topic: Dark Matter finally found?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12448
Re: Dark Matter finally found?
WIMPs are not found, yet! The CDMSII didn't found a WIMP. They found 2 WIMP like signals events at a background of 1. This is not really a significant level. But there are many other experiments and CDMS will upgraded. http://cdms.berkeley.edu/ I think it is not important that one experiment found s...