Search found 49 matches

by adam_jeff
Tue Jul 19, 2011 10:18 am
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Problems with lower emittance and higher intensities?
Replies: 7
Views: 12651

Re: Problems with lower emittance and higher intensities?

@ Kasuha: I think jmc is referring to beam size, that is diameter, not beam intensity. But you are quite right about the injections. @ jmc2000: I see the ramp that I think you're referring to. In fact, the linear increase in beam size comes before the ramp, when there is no beam. In any case beam si...
by adam_jeff
Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:19 am
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Problems with lower emittance and higher intensities?
Replies: 7
Views: 12651

Re: Problems with lower emittance and higher intensities?

As far as I know, lower emittance is quite hard to achieve but it doesn't really cause any problems. It does make the 'space charge' effect worse (this is the defocusing effect of having so many positive charges close to each other) but this is more a problem in the injectors than the LHC (space cha...
by adam_jeff
Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:50 pm
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Does beam size spike when ramping up energy cause problems?
Replies: 5
Views: 8808

Re: Does beam size spike when ramping up energy cause proble

Out of interest, which instrument is the beam size which you see spiking measured with? I believe he means the Dashboard , there's a Beam Size graph on the left. I think that the beam size shown there is the one measured by the BSRT (synchrotron light measurements) although I'm not sure why there a...
by adam_jeff
Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:58 pm
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Does beam size spike when ramping up energy cause problems?
Replies: 5
Views: 8808

Re: Does beam size spike when ramping up energy cause proble

jmc2000 wrote:I've noticed that there is now a single very large beam size spike when rampling up the energy,

Is this causing any problems?
Out of interest, which instrument is the beam size which you see spiking measured with?
by adam_jeff
Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:14 pm
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: 2011 Events Discussion
Replies: 184
Views: 259743

Re: 2011 Events Discussion

Now. Protestation movement no beam, no access Ummm, what ? Page 1 says access ongoing. That was this morning on CPS page!! There was a 4 hour work stoppage by CERN staff this morning in protest at proposed changes to their pension scheme. I don't know how many people took part or what effect it had...
by adam_jeff
Tue Jun 21, 2011 11:37 am
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Luminosity vs. number of collisions
Replies: 4
Views: 8390

Re: Luminosity vs. number of collisions

Oh and a barn is technically a unit of area, equal to 10^-24 square cm. So the luminosity can also be given as cm-2. For example, right now the ATLAS instantaneous luminosity is 600 * 10^30 cm-2 s-1, which is the same as 600 *10^6 inverse barns per second or 600 inverse microbarns per second. Theref...
by adam_jeff
Tue Jun 21, 2011 10:18 am
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Luminosity vs. number of collisions
Replies: 4
Views: 8390

Re: Luminosity vs. number of collisions

The coefficient is called the cross-section. Cross-sections can be defined for each type of collision but I guess what you're interested in is the 'total inelastic cross-section' which will give you the total number of collisions (the 'total cross-section' also includes elastic colisions, where two ...
by adam_jeff
Mon Jun 06, 2011 3:27 pm
Forum: Science
Topic: Proton mass increase
Replies: 7
Views: 17811

Re: Proton mass increase

Photino is correct. I'll just add that the Lorentz contraction affects only the length in the direction of movement. So the photons get shorter (in the direction of travel) but keep the same diamater (in the perpendicular directions). Thus they do indeed end up looking like pancakes. But since their...
by adam_jeff
Mon May 30, 2011 9:31 am
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?
Replies: 9
Views: 13572

Re: Are all interfaces to the ring optically coupled?

As pcatom said, redundancy is not quite as simple as 'let's buy two of everything'. There is also the question of finding space for 2 systems, having suitable alarms to know when the primary system is failing, whether the backup can kick in fast enough to prevent a dump...
by adam_jeff
Thu May 05, 2011 2:07 pm
Forum: Controversial topics
Topic: Frequencies and Densities
Replies: 17
Views: 35522

Re: Vacuum Bubbles

I haven't had the time to check your figures, but I think there's a false assumption in the way you're using the cosmic ray data anyway. If you assume that cosmic rays are evenly distributed, then it's true that the flux and thereforer the rate of collisions in a given volume) is much smaller than i...
by adam_jeff
Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:40 pm
Forum: The Accelerator
Topic: Prospects for 2011 (via reuters)
Replies: 12
Views: 16829

Re: Prospects for 2011 (via reuters)

No, Reuters got it right on this occasion - there is a possibility that the energy will be increased to 4TeV in 2012, energy increase has only been ruled out for 2011.
by adam_jeff
Wed Feb 02, 2011 2:58 pm
Forum: Controversial topics
Topic: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?
Replies: 28
Views: 47744

Re: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?

Hah, I guess I should have read the basics before I answered that last part:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound
The speed of sound is given by square root (coefficient of stiffness / density), known as the Newton-Laplace formula.
by adam_jeff
Wed Feb 02, 2011 2:51 pm
Forum: Controversial topics
Topic: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?
Replies: 28
Views: 47744

Re: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?

To clarify my general point that heat and sound can both be vibrations within the lattice but behave diferently, perhaps this page will help: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phonon To clarify point 2: There's a difference in what it means to transfer 5W of heat energy and 5W of sound energy. Let's say ...
by adam_jeff
Wed Jan 19, 2011 9:57 am
Forum: Controversial topics
Topic: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?
Replies: 28
Views: 47744

Re: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?

1. The difference is between an oscillation and a one-way movement. If you shift the metal rod by one micron, then after an extremely short time the other end will also move by one micron. But if you oscillate one end of the rod with an amplitude of one micron, the other end will oscillate with a sm...
by adam_jeff
Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:03 pm
Forum: Controversial topics
Topic: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?
Replies: 28
Views: 47744

Re: Heat conduction in solids: Why is it so slow?

The rate of heat propagations is slow because the amplitude of the vibration is small. This means that the perturbation to neighbouring atoms is also small. the energy in a vibrating atom is a function of the amplitude and the frequency of vibration. Increasing the heat energy increases the frequenc...